Using Interactive Read-alouds to Increase K-2 Students' Reading Comprehension

Ability to read single words, sentences and whole texts fluently and to understand them in context

Reading comprehension is the ability to process text, understand its meaning, and to integrate with what the reader already knows.^[1] ^[2] Fundamental skills required in efficient reading comprehension are knowing meaning of words, ability to understand meaning of a word from discourse context, ability to follow organization of passage and to identify antecedents and references in it, ability to draw inferences from a passage about its contents, ability to identify the main thought of a passage, ability to reply questions answered in a passage, power to recognize the literary devices or propositional structures used in a passage and make up one's mind its tone, to understand the situational mood (agents, objects, temporal and spatial reference points, casual and intentional inflections, etc.) conveyed for assertions, questioning, commanding, refraining etc. and finally ability to make up one's mind writer's purpose, intent and signal of view, and draw inferences nearly the author (discourse-semantics).^[3] ^[4]

In that location are many reading strategies to improve reading comprehension and inferences, including improving ane'due south vocabulary, critical text assay (intertextuality, bodily events vs. narration of events, etc.) and practicing deep reading.^[five] Ability to comprehend text is influenced by readers' skills and their ability to procedure information. If word recognition is difficult, students use too much of their processing capacity to read individual words, which interferes with their power to cover what is read.

Overview [edit]

People acquire comprehension skills through didactics or educational activity and some learn by direct experiences.^[6] Skilful reading depends on the ability to recognize words apace and effortlessly.^[seven] Information technology is likewise determined by an individual's cognitive development, which is "the construction of thought processes".

There are specific characteristics that make up one's mind how successfully an individual volition comprehend text, including prior knowledge near the subject, well-adult language, and the ability to make inferences from methodical questioning & monitoring comprehension similar: "Why is this important?" and "Do I need to read the entire text?" are examples of passage questioning.^[8]

Instruction for comprehension strategy often involves initially aiding the students past social and faux learning, wherein teachers explain genre styles and model both top-downwardly and bottom-upward strategies, and familiarize students with a required complexity of text comprehension.^[9] Subsequently the contiguity interface, the second stage involves gradual release of responsibility wherein over time teachers give students individual responsibleness for using the learned strategies independently with remedial educational activity equally required and this helps in mistake management. The final stage involves leading the students to a cocky-regulated learning state with more and more practice and assessment, it leads to overlearning and the learned skills will become reflexive or "second nature."^[ten] The teacher as reading instructor is a role model of a reader for students, demonstrating what it means to be an effective reader and the rewards of existence one.^[11]

Definition [edit]

"The ability to understand information presented in the written class is called reading Comprehension".^[12] ^[13] Comprehension is a "creative, multifaceted process" dependent upon four linguistic communication skills: phonology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics.^[14]

Reading comprehension levels [edit]

Reading comprehension involves ii levels of processing, shallow (low-level) processing and deep (high-level) processing. Deep processing involves semantic processing, which happens when we encode the meaning of a discussion and chronicle it to like words. Shallow processing involves structural and phonemic recognition, the processing of sentence and word structure, i.e. starting time-order logic, and their associated sounds. This theory was kickoff identified by Fergus I. Thou. Craik and Robert S. Lockhart.^[15]

Comprehension levels are observed through neuroimaging techniques similar functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). fMRI'due south are used to determine the specific neural pathways of activation across ii conditions, narrative-level comprehension and sentence-level comprehension. Images showed that there was less encephalon region activation during sentence-level comprehension, suggesting a shared reliance with comprehension pathways. The scans also showed an enhanced temporal activation during narrative levels tests indicating this arroyo activates situation and spatial processing.^[16] In full general, neuroimaging studies have found that reading involves iii overlapping neural systems: networks active in visual, orthography-phonology (Angular gyrus), and semantic functions (Inductive temporal lobe with Broca'southward and Wernicke's area). Still, these neural networks are not detached, meaning these areas have several other functions as well. The Broca's area involved in executive functions helps the reader to vary depth of reading comprehension and textual engagement in accordance with reading goals.^[17] ^[xviii]

Vocabulary [edit]

Reading comprehension and vocabulary are inextricably linked together. The power to decode or identify and pronounce words is self-patently important, but knowing what the words mean has a major and direct effect on knowing what any specific passage means while skimming a reading material. It has been shown that students with a smaller vocabulary than other students comprehend less of what they read.^[19] It has been suggested that to improve comprehension, improving discussion groups, complex vocabularies such every bit homonyms or words that have multiple meanings, and those with figurative meanings like idioms, similes, collocations and metaphors are a good practise.^[20]

Andrew Biemiller argues that teachers should give out topic related words and phrases before reading a volume to students, teaching includes topic related discussion groups, synonyms of words and their significant with the context, and he further says to familiarize students with judgement structures in which these words ordinarily occur.^[21] Biemiller says this intensive approach gives students opportunities to explore the topic across its discourse - freedom of conceptual expansion. However, there is no evidence to suggest the primacy of this approach.^[22] Incidental Morphemic assay of words - prefixes, suffixes and roots - is likewise considered to amend understanding of the vocabulary, though they are proved to exist an unreliable strategy for improving comprehension and is no longer used to teach students.^[23]

History [edit]

Initially most comprehension pedagogy was based on imparting selected techniques for each genre that when taken together would allow students to be strategic readers. However, from 1930s testing various methods never seemed to win back up in empirical inquiry. One such strategy for improving reading comprehension is the technique called SQ3R introduced by Francis Pleasant Robinson in his 1946 book Effective Study.^[24]

Betwixt 1969 and 2000, a number of "strategies" were devised for teaching students to employ self-guided methods for improving reading comprehension. In 1969 Anthony V. Manzo designed and plant empirical support for the Re Quest, or Reciprocal Questioning Procedure in traditional teacher-centered arroyo due to its sharing of "cerebral secrets." It was the offset method to catechumen fundamental theory such equally social learning into instruction methods through the use of cognitive modeling betwixt teachers and students.^[25]

Since the turn of the 20th century, comprehension lessons usually consist of students answering instructor's questions or writing responses to questions of their own, or from prompts of the teacher.^[26] This discrete whole group version simply helped students individually to respond to portions of the text (Content area reading), and improve their writing skills.^{[ citation needed ]} In the final quarter of the 20th century, evidence accumulated that academic reading test methods were more than successful in assessing rather than imparting comprehension or giving a realistic insight. Instead of using the prior response registering method, research studies have concluded that an effective way to teach comprehension is to teach novice readers a bank of "practical reading strategies" or tools to translate and clarify various categories and styles of text.^[27]

Reading strategies [edit]

In that location are a variety of strategies used to teach reading. Strategies are key to assistance with reading comprehension. They vary co-ordinate to the challenges like new concepts, unfamiliar vocabulary, long and complex sentences, etc. Trying to bargain with all of these challenges at the same time may be unrealistic. Then again strategies should fit to the ability, aptitude and age level of the learner. Some of the strategies teachers use are: reading aloud, grouping work, and more than reading exercises.^{[ commendation needed ]}

A U.South. Marine helps a educatee with reading comprehension equally part of a Partnership in Teaching programme sponsored past Park Street Uncomplicated School and Navy/Marine Corps Reserve Center Atlanta. The program is a community out-reach program for sailors and Marines to visit the school and help students with class work.

Reciprocal didactics [edit]

In the 1980s Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar and Ann L. Brown developed a technique called reciprocal instruction that taught students to predict, summarize, clarify, and ask questions for sections of a text. The use of strategies like summarizing after each paragraph have come to be seen as effective strategies for building students' comprehension. The thought is that students will develop stronger reading comprehension skills on their own if the teacher gives them explicit mental tools for unpacking text.^[27]

Instructional conversations [edit]

"Instructional conversations", or comprehension through discussion, create higher-level thinking opportunities for students by promoting critical and aesthetic thinking about the text. According to Vivian Thayer, form discussions help students to generate ideas and new questions. (Goldenberg, p. 317). Dr. Neil Postman has said, "All our knowledge results from questions, which is another way of saying that question-asking is our most important intellectual tool"^{[ citation needed ]} (Response to Intervention). At that place are several types of questions that a instructor should focus on: remembering; testing understanding; application or solving; invite synthesis or creating; and evaluation and judging. Teachers should model these types of questions through "think-alouds" before, during, and after reading a text. When a student can relate a passage to an experience, another volume, or other facts about the earth, they are "making a connection." Making connections help students understand the author's purpose and fiction or non-fiction story.^[28]

Text factors [edit]

At that place are factors, that once discerned, make information technology easier for the reader to sympathize the written text. Ane is the genre, similar folktales, historical fiction, biographies or poesy. Each genre has its ain characteristics for text structure, that once understood help the reader encompass it. A story is composed of a plot, characters, setting, point of view, and theme. Informational books provide real world noesis for students and have unique features such equally: headings, maps, vocabulary, and an index. Poems are written in unlike forms and the most commonly used are: rhymed verse, haikus, gratis poesy, and narratives. Poetry uses devices such as: alliteration, repetition, rhyme, metaphors, and similes. "When children are familiar with genres, organizational patterns, and text features in books they're reading, they're better able to create those text factors in their own writing." Another one is arranging the text per perceptual bridge and the text display favorable to the historic period level of the reader.^[29]

Not-Verbal Imagery [edit]

Media that utilizes schema to make connections either planned or non, more commonly used inside context such as: a passage, an experience, or ane'due south imagination. Some notable examples are emojis, emoticons, cropped and uncropped images, and recently Imojis which are humorous, cropped images that are used to elicit humor and comprehension.^[xxx]

Visualization [edit]

Visualization is a "mental epitome" created in a person'due south mind while reading text, which "brings words to life" and helps improve reading comprehension. Asking sensory questions will assist students become improve visualizers.^[28] Students can practice visualizing past imagining what they "encounter, hear, smell, taste, or feel" when they are reading a page of a picture book aloud, only not yet shown the picture. They tin can share their visualizations, then check their level of detail against the illustrations.

Partner reading [edit]

Partner reading is a strategy created for pairs. The teacher chooses two appropriate books for the students to read. Get-go the pupils and their partners, must read their own book. One time they take completed this, they are given the opportunity to write down their ain comprehensive questions for their partner. The students bandy books, read them out loud to one some other and enquire ane another questions nearly the book they read. At that place are different levels of this. In that location are the lower ones who demand actress help recording the strategies. The adjacent level are the average but, volition yet need some help. There is a good level where the children are good with no help required. Finally a very good level, where they are a few years alee.

This strategy:

Provides a model of fluent reading and helps students larn decoding skills by offering positive feedback.^[31]
Provides direct opportunities for a instructor to broadcast in the class, notice students, and offer private remediation.^[31]

Multiple reading strategies [edit]

There are a wide range of reading strategies suggested by reading programs and educators. Effective reading strategies may differ for second linguistic communication learners, as opposed to native speakers.^[32] ^[33] ^[34] The National Reading Console identified positive effects merely for a subset, particularly summarizing, request questions, answering questions, comprehension monitoring, graphic organizers, and cooperative learning. The Panel also emphasized that a combination of strategies, as used in Reciprocal Teaching, can be effective.^[28] The apply of constructive comprehension strategies that provide specific instructions for developing and retaining comprehension skills, with intermittent feedback, has been found to better reading comprehension across all ages, specifically those affected by mental disabilities.^[35]

Reading different types of texts requires the use of different reading strategies and approaches. Making reading an agile, observable process can be very benign to struggling readers. A good reader interacts with the text in club to develop an understanding of the information before them. Some good reader strategies are predicting, connecting, inferring, summarizing, analyzing and critiquing. There are many resource and activities educators and instructors of reading tin use to help with reading strategies in specific content areas and disciplines. Some examples are graphic organizers, talking to the text, apprehension guides, double entry journals, interactive reading and note taking guides, chunking, and summarizing.^{[ commendation needed ]}

The use of constructive comprehension strategies is highly important when learning to ameliorate reading comprehension. These strategies provide specific instructions for developing and retaining comprehension skills across all ages.^[35] Applying methods to accomplish an overt phonemic awareness with intermittent practice has been found to improve reading in early ages, specifically those afflicted by mental disabilities.

Comprehension Strategies [edit]

Research studies on reading and comprehension have shown that highly proficient readers use a number of dissimilar strategies to cover various types of texts, strategies that can also be used by less skillful readers in order to improve their comprehension.

Making Inferences: In everyday terms we refer to this equally "reading betwixt the lines". It involves connecting various parts of texts that aren't directly linked in order to form a sensible decision. A form of assumption, the reader speculates what connections lie within the texts.
Planning and Monitoring: This strategy centers around the reader's mental sensation and their ability to control their comprehension by fashion of awareness. By previewing text (via outlines, table of contents, etc.) 1 tin establish a goal for reading-"what exercise I need to get out of this"? Readers apply context clues and other evaluation strategies to analyze texts and ideas, and thus monitoring their level of agreement.
Request Questions: To solidify 1'due south understanding of passages of texts readers inquire and develop their own stance of the author'south writing, character motivations, relationships, etc. This strategy involves allowing oneself to exist completely objective in lodge to find various meanings within the text.
Determining Importance: Pinpointing the important ideas and messages within the text. Readers are taught to identify straight and indirect ideas and to summarize the relevance of each.
Visualizing: With this sensory-driven strategy readers form mental and visual images of the contents of text. Being able to connect visually allows for a amend understanding with the text through emotional responses.
Synthesizing: This method involves marrying multiple ideas from various texts in order to draw conclusions and make comparisons across unlike texts; with the reader's goal being to understand how they all fit together.
Making Connections: A cerebral approach also referred to as "reading beyond the lines", which involves (A) finding a personal connection to reading, such as personal experience, previously read texts, etc. to assist institute a deeper understanding of the context of the text, or (B) thinking about implications that have no firsthand connexion with the theme of the text.^[36]

Assessment [edit]

There are breezy and formal assessments to monitor an individual'southward comprehension ability and employ of comprehension strategies.^[37] Informal assessments are generally through observation and the use of tools, similar story boards, word sorts, and interactive writing. Many teachers use Formative assessments to determine if a student has mastered content of the lesson. Formative assessments can exist verbal as in a Retrieve-Pair-Share or Partner Share. Formative Assessments can as well be Ticket out the door or digital summarizers. Formal assessments are district or state assessments that evaluates all students on important skills and concepts. Summative assessments are typically assessments given at the end of a unit to measure out a student'due south learning.

Running records [edit]

^[38] Running Record Codes

A popular assessment undertaken in numerous primary schools around the world are running records. Running records are a helpful tool in regard to reading comprehension.^[39] The tool assists teachers in analysing specific patterns in pupil behaviours and planning appropriate didactics. By conducting running records teachers are given an overview of students reading abilities and learning over a period of fourth dimension.

In order for teachers to conduct a running record properly, they must sit abreast a educatee and make sure that the surround is every bit relaxed as possible so the student does not feel pressured or intimidated. Information technology is best if the running tape assessment is conducted during reading, so there are non distractions. Another alternative is asking an education banana to bear the running record for you lot in a carve up room whilst you teach/supervise the course. Quietly detect the students reading and tape during this time. There is a specific code for recording which most teachers understand. One time the pupil has finished reading ask them to retell the story equally best they tin. After the completion of this, inquire them comprehensive questions listed to exam them on their understanding of the book. At the end of the cess add together upwardly their running record score and file the assessment canvas away. Afterwards the completion of the running tape assessment, programme strategies that will improve the students' ability to read and understand the text.

Overview of the steps taken when conducting a Running Record assessment:^[twoscore]

Select the text
Introduce the text
Have a running record
Ask for retelling of the story
Ask comprehensive questions
Check fluency
Analyse the record
Plan strategies to amend students reading/understanding ability
File results away

Hard or circuitous content [edit]

Reading difficult texts [edit]

Some texts, similar in philosophy, literature or scientific enquiry, may appear more difficult to read because of the prior noesis they assume, the tradition from which they come, or the tone, such equally criticizing or parodying.^{[ citation needed ]} Philosopher Jacques Derrida, explained his opinion about complicated text: "In order to unfold what is implicit in so many discourses, one would have each fourth dimension to brand a pedagogical outlay that is just not reasonable to wait from every volume. Hither the responsibility has to be shared out, mediated; the reading has to practice its piece of work and the work has to brand its reader."^[41] Other philosophers, however, believe that if you take something to say, you should be able to brand the message readable to a broad audition.^{[ citation needed ]}

Hyperlinks [edit]

Embedded hyperlinks in documents or Internet pages have been constitute to make unlike demands on the reader than traditional text. Authors, such as Nicholas Carr, and psychologists, such every bit Maryanne Wolf, debate that the internet may have a negative touch on on attention and reading comprehension.^[42] Some studies written report increased demands of reading hyperlinked text in terms of cognitive load, or the amount of data actively maintained in one's heed (too encounter working retentivity).^[43] One written report showed that going from near 5 hyperlinks per page to nearly 11 per page reduced higher students' understanding (assessed by multiple choice tests) of articles about alternative energy.^[44] This can be attributed to the conclusion-making process (deciding whether to click on it) required by each hyperlink,^[43] which may reduce comprehension of surrounding text.

On the other manus, other studies have shown that if a short summary of the link'southward content is provided when the mouse pointer hovers over it, then comprehension of the text is improved.^[45] "Navigation hints" about which links are almost relevant improved comprehension.^[46] Finally, the background knowledge of the reader can partially determine the effect hyperlinks take on comprehension. In a study of reading comprehension with subjects who were familiar or unfamiliar with fine art history, texts which were hyperlinked to one another hierarchically were easier for novices to understand than texts which were hyperlinked semantically. In dissimilarity, those already familiar with the topic understood the content equally well with both types of arrangement.^[43]

In interpreting these results, information technology may exist useful to annotation that the studies mentioned were all performed in airtight content environments, not on the internet. That is, the texts used just linked to a predetermined fix of other texts which was offline. Furthermore, the participants were explicitly instructed to read on a certain topic in a limited amount of time. Reading text on the cyberspace may not have these constraints.^{[ citation needed ]}

Professional development [edit]

The National Reading Panel noted that comprehension strategy pedagogy is difficult for many teachers likewise as for students, particularly considering they were not taught this manner and considering it is a enervating task. They suggested that professional development can increase teachers/students willingness to use reading strategies but admitted that much remains to be washed in this area.^{[ citation needed ]} The directed listening and thinking action is a technique available to teachers to help students in learning how to un-read and reading comprehension. It is also difficult for students that are new. In that location is often some debate when considering the human relationship betwixt reading fluency and reading comprehension. In that location is evidence of a straight correlation that fluency and comprehension lead to better understanding of the written material, across all ages.^{[ commendation needed ]} The National Assessment of Educational Progress assessed U.S. pupil functioning in reading at course 12 from both public and private school population and found that only 37 percentage of students were having proficient skills. The bulk, 72 percentage of the students were only at or above basic skills, and alarmingly a 28 percentage of the students were below basic level.^[47]

References [edit]

^ "What is Reading Comprehension?". Reading Worksheets, Spelling, Grammar, Comprehension, Lesson Plans. 2008-05-29. Archived from the original on 2016-05-09. Retrieved 2016-05-13 .
^ William Grabe (2009). Reading in a 2nd Linguistic communication: Moving from Theory to Practice. Cambridge Academy Press. ISBN978-0-521-72974-1. Archived from the original on 2018-05-04. Koda, 2005:4
^ Davis, Frederick B. (September 1944). "Fundamental factors of comprehension in reading". Psychometrika. 9 (3): 185–197. doi:10.1007/BF02288722. S2CID 67849226.
^ Committee on Learning Sciences: Foundations and Applications to Boyish and Adult Literacy; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; National Research Council (2012). Improving Adult Literacy Instruction: Options for Practice and Research. National Academies Printing. p. 41. ISBN978-0-309-21960-0. Archived from the original on 2018-05-04.
^ Maryanne Wolf (2016). Tales of Literacy for the 21st Century: The Literary Agenda. OUP Oxford. ISBN978-0-nineteen-103613-ii.
^ Tompkins, 1000.Eastward. (2011). Literacy in the early grades: A successful start for prek-iv readers (third edition), Boston, Pearson. pp. 5, 7.
^ Adams, Marilyn McCord (1994). Beginning to read: thinking and learning nigh print . Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. ISBN978-0-262-51076-nine. OCLC 62108874. Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print.
^ Tompkins, Grand.Due east. (2011). Literacy in the early grades: A successful showtime for prek-four readers (3rd edition), Boston, Pearson. pp. 205, 208–209, 211–212.
^ Ula C. Manzo; Anthony V. Manzo (1993). Literacy Disorders: Holistic Diagnosis and Remediation. LiteracyLeaders. p. 26. ISBN978-0-03-072633-0.
^ "Outcome of overlearning on retention". psycnet.apa.org . Retrieved 2019-11-19 .
^ Richard R. Mean solar day; Julian Bamford (1998). All-encompassing Reading in the 2d Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-56829-six.
^ Keith Rayner; Barbara Foorman; Charles Perfetti; David Pesetsky & Mark Seidenberg (November 2001). "How Psychological Science Informs the Education of Reading". Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2 (2): 31–74. CiteSeerX10.one.1.14.4083. doi:10.1111/1529-1006.00004. PMID 26151366. S2CID 134422.
^ Tompkins, M.E. (2011). Literacy in the early grades: A successful start for prek-four readers (3rd edition), Boston, Pearson. p 203.
^ Tompkins, G.E. (2011). Literacy in the early grades: A successful start for prek-4 readers (third edition), Boston, Pearson. p 37
^ Richard K. Wagner; Christopher Schatschneider; Caroline Phythian-Sence (19 June 2009). Beyond Decoding: The Behavioral and Biological Foundations of Reading Comprehension. Guilford Press. pp. 143–175. ISBN978-ane-60623-356-vi.
^ Speer, Nicole; Yarkoni, Tal; Zacks, Jeffrey (2008). "Neural substrates of narrative comprehension and memory". NeuroImage. 41 (4): 1408–1425. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.062. PMC2580728. PMID 18499478.
^ Usha Goswami (2011). The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 342+. ISBN978-1-4443-5173-6. Archived from the original on 2018-05-04.
^ David A. Sousa (eight Baronial 2011). How the Brain Learns. SAGE Publications. pp. 193+. ISBN978-i-4522-7775-2.
^ Nielsen, Diane. "Study shows greater focus on vocabulary tin can help make students improve readers". news.ku.edu. The Academy of Kansas. Archived from the original on 3 February 2013. Retrieved 15 March 2013. if they don't empathise the meaning of the words, so their ability to understand the overall meaning of a story or other text will be compromised
^ Tompkins, G.E. (2011). Literacy in the early on grades: A successful beginning for prek-4 readers (tertiary edition), Boston, Pearson. pp. 171, 181, 183.
^ Biemiller & Boote, 2006
^ Linda Kucan; Brook, Isabel L.; McKeown, Margaret G. (2002). Bringing words to life: robust vocabulary didactics . New York: Guilford Press. ISBN978-1-57230-753-7. OCLC 48450880.
^ Matthew Thousand. Thomas; Manzo, Anthony V.; Manzo, Ula Casale (2005). Content area literacy: strategic teaching for strategic learning. New York: Wiley. pp. 163–4. ISBN978-0-471-15167-eight. OCLC 58833339.
^ Robinson, Francis Pleasant (1978). Effective Report (6th ed.). New York: Harper & Row. ISBN978-0-06-045521-seven.
^ "Reading and Questioning: The ReQuest Process - ProQuest". search.proquest.com . Retrieved 2018-10-14 .
^ Pearson, P. David. "The Roots of Reading Comprehension Instruction" (PDF). postgradolinguistica.ucv.cl. University of California, Berkeley. Archived (PDF) from the original on eighteen December 2013. Retrieved fifteen March 2013.
^ ^a ^b Pressley, Michael (2006). Reading didactics that works: the case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford Press. ISBN1-59385-229-0. OCLC 61229782. Archived from the original on 2018-05-04.
^ ^a ^b ^c Dan Bong, The GRE Handbook - The How to on GRE, Consummate Expert's Hints and Tips Guide by the Leading Experts, Everything You Need to Know nearly GRE, p.68
^ Tompkins, One thousand.E. (2011). Literacy in the early grades: A successful start for prek-four readers (3rd edition), Boston, Pearson. p. 249.
^ Vargas, Evan (Summer 2016). "Ha-Ha, I'thou Comprehending With Imojis" (PDF). Colorado Reading Periodical. 27: sixteen–19. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-30.
^ ^a ^b "Partner Reading". Reading Rockets. Archived from the original on 2016-05-06. Retrieved 2016-05-13 .
^ Tanyeli, Nadıran (2009). "The efficiency of online English language language instruction on students' reading skills". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. ane (1): 564–567. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.102.
^ Iwai, Yuko (Summertime 2008). "The Perceptions of Japanese Students toward Academic English Reading: Implications for Effective ESL Reading Strategies". Multicultural Didactics; San Francisco. 15 (4): 45–50. ProQuest 216511645 Gale A184800662 ERIC EJ809075.
^ Deacon, S. Hélène; Wade-Woolley, Lesly; Kirby, John R. (May 2009). "Flexibility in young second-language learners: examining the language specificity of orthographic processing". Journal of Research in Reading. 32 (ii): 215–229. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01392.x.
^ ^a ^b Berkeley, Sheri; Mastropieri, Margo A.; Scruggs, Thomas E. (Jan 2011). "Reading Comprehension Strategy Educational activity and Attribution Retraining for Secondary Students With Learning and Other Mild Disabilities". Periodical of Learning Disabilities. 44 (1): 18–32. doi:x.1177/0022219410371677. PMID 21335506. S2CID 22697420.
^ "Speed Reading Tip: A Report on vii Reading Strategies To Read More Proficiently - Read Write Piece of work". speedreadinfo.com. 15 August 2016. Archived from the original on 28 April 2017. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
^ Tompkins, K.E. (2011). Literacy in the early grades: A successful outset for prek-four readers (3rd edition), Boston, Pearson.^{[ page needed ]}
^ "How to take running records" (PDF). Scholastic. Scholastic Canada Ltd. 2002. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-01-10. Retrieved 2016-05-13 .
^ How To Take Running Records. Canada: Scholastic Canada Ltd. 2002. p. 1.
^ n/a, due north/a (2002). How to take running records. Canada: Scholastic Canada Ltd. pp. nine–xi.
^ Jacques Derrida (1987) Heidegger, the Philosopher's Hell, interview by Didier Eribon for Le Nouvel Observateur upshot of Nov vi–12, republished in Points: Interviews 1974-1994 (1995) pp.187-8
^ Nicholas G. Carr (2010). The shallows: what the Cyberspace is doing to our brains . New York: Westward.Westward. Norton. ISBN978-0-393-07222-8. OCLC 449865498.
^ ^a ^b ^c DeStefano, Diana; LeFevre, Jo-Anne (1 May 2007). "Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review". Computers in Human Behavior. 23 (3): 1616–1641. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.012.
^ Zhu, Erping (1 September 1999). "Hypermedia interface pattern: the effects of number of links and granularity of nodes". Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 8 (3): 331–358.
^ Antonenko, Pavlo D.; Niederhauser, Dale S. (March 2010). "The influence of leads on cognitive load and learning in a hypertext surroundings". Computers in Man Beliefs. 26 (2): 140–150. doi:ten.1016/j.chb.2009.ten.014.
^ Ignacio Madrid, R.; Van Oostendorp, Herre; Puerta Melguizo, Mari Carmen (1 January 2009). "The effects of the number of links and navigation support on cognitive load and learning with hypertext: The mediating office of reading social club". Computers in Human Beliefs. 25 (1): 66–75. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.06.005.
^ "Reading Performance" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-31. Retrieved 2018-03-07 .

External links [edit]

Info, Tips, and Strategies for PTE Read Aloud, Limited English Linguistic communication Training Center
English Reading Comprehension Skills, Andrews University
Vocabulary Didactics and Reading comprehension - From the ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading English language and Communication.
ReadWorks.org | The Solution to Reading Comprehension
Tips on improving Reading Comprehension Skills
Improving reading fluency

rosslooduale.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reading_comprehension